Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46785/2018bail granted

Buchchi Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-18Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46785 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -50 Year- 2018 Thana -PUNPUN District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Buchchi Singh

2. Pramod Singh

3. Pahlad Singh@ Chhote Singh All sons of Tribhuvan Singh R/o VillLakhanpar, P.S. Punpun, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lallu Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Murlidhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

Petitioners pray for bail in connection with Punpun P.S.Case No. 50 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 325, 379 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is that they have assaulted the informant, causing injuries.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there are four accused persons and allegation is general and omnibus in nature and they are in custody since 3.4.2018. Heard learned APP and learned counsel for the informant, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that after

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46785 of 2018 (2) dt.18-09-2018 2/2 the occurrence again they have cut mango plantation of the informant from his field.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Masaurhi, Patna, in connection with Punpun P.S.Case No. 50 of 2018, subject to the that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned and further condition is that petitioners shall not threat the informant and his family members and shall not tamper with the evidence, otherwise prosecution is given liberty to move for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U