Rakesh Kumar Singh @ Pappu Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48409 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -187 Year- 2018 Thana -GAYA MUFFSIL District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Rakesh Kumar Singh @ Pappu Singh Son of Ravinandan Singh@ Kamta Singh

2. Ravinandan Singh@ Kamta Singh Son of late Ram Anugrah Singh Both Resident of Village- Salempur, P.S. Rajauli, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Nayan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-08-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 187 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is of kidnapping the daughter of the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have falsely been implicated in this case and have no role to play in the kidnapping of the daughter of the informant, which will appear from the fact that the girl has returned and her statement was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., in which, she has not named these petitioners.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48409 of 2018 (2) dt.24-08-2018 2/2 surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 187 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T