Md. Shahrukh Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 52381 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2022 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

Md. Shahrukh Ansari Son Of Kapil Ansari @ Md. Kafil Ansari R/O VillageMustafapur Purani, P.S.- Jagdispur, District- Bhagalpur 2.

Md. Arbaz Ansari Son Of Kapil Ansari @ Md. Kafil Ansari R/O VillageMustafapur Purani, P.S.- Jagdispur, District- Bhagalpur 3.

Md. Shadaf Ansari @ Shadaf Son Of Kapil Ansari @ Md. Kafil Ansari R/O Village- Mustafapur Purani, P.S.- Jagdispur, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajive Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kalyan Shankar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-12-2022 Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 353, 379, 504 and 34 of Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is that the account of the petitioners were disclosed NPA due to the non-payment of loan for which legal notice was also issued and on 12.03.2022 for National Lok Adalat. The Bank Manager UCO Bank went to serve notice upon the accused along with other police official and when they reached the house of accused namely Kafil

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 52381 of 2022(2) dt.13-12-2022 2/3 Ansari and his two son abused him and pushed him and severely assaulted them and also snatched Rs. 10,000/- kept in the pocket.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. It is further submitted that it is clear from the impugned order that the injury is simple in nature and they have deposited all the outstanding amount of NPA. The allegation leveled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and materials available on record, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in Jagdishpur P.S.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 52381 of 2022(2) dt.13-12-2022 3/3 Case No. 89 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ishika/divyanshi U T