← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51902/2026bail granted

Uday Kumar @ Uday Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-24Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51902 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-188 Year-2025 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Uday Kumar @ Uday Ray S/o Shivnath Ray R/o vill - Enayat Nagar Rasulpur, P.s.- Goraul, Distt.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Anita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 274 and 275 of BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is in custody since 20-5-2026 and allegation is of recovery of 2496.6 litres of liquor from a truck.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51902 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026 2/2 his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated and at the same time shall bring disrepute to his business, it is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that the driver of his driver would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged, who was also fled from the spot.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sakri P.S. Case No. 118 of 2025.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T