Vishwanath Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9644 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Vishwanath Singh Son of Late Jagdish Singh, Resident of VillageKauyakhoh, P.S- Dehri-on- son and District- Rohtas At Sasaram.

2. Bhagmaniya Devi Wife of Rajbali Bhagat, Resident of VillageNararikala, P.S- Barun and District- Aurangabad.

3. Bheekhar Bhagat Son of Late Huseini Bhagat, resident of VillageNarari Kala, P.S- Barun, District- Aurangabad.

4. Baikunth Mehta Son of Late Balku Mehta, resident of VillageChaurahee, P.S- Nabinagar and District- Aurangabad.

5. Pramila Devi Wife of Sri Vinay Singh, Resident of Village- Sasna,P.SNabinagar and District- Aurangabad.

6. Deena Nath Singh Son of Late Chandradev Singh, Resident of VillageAnkorha, P.S- Nabinagar and District- Aurangabad.

7. Baijnath Paswan Son of Bhagwan Paswan, resident of Village- Sasana, P.S- Nabinagar, and District- Aurangabad.

8. Urmila Devi Wife of Bal Ram Sharma, Resident of Village- Narari Kala, P.S- Barun and District- Aurangabad.

9. Bhola Yadav Son of Sri Mahadev Yadav, Resident of Village- Sasna, P.S- Nabinagar and District- Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reform, Govt. of Bihar, Patna ( Bihar).

2. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.

3. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Aurangabad.

4. The Chief Executive Officer, Nabinagar, Power Generating Company Site office, Barun, P.S- Barun and District- Aurangabad. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma, Adv. For the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Mr. Kaushal Kumar Jha, AAG-14 For the Respondent No. 4 : Mrs. Binita Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-10-2016 Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the grievances of the writ petitioners have been redressed. Therefore, he seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition.

Leave is granted.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9644 of 2014 (3) dt.26-10-2016 2/2 The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, since it has become infructuous.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U