Yogendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13417 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

Yogendra Singh son of Late Damodar Singh, Resident of Village- Sadokhar, P.S.- Chenari, District- Rohtas (Sasaram), Bihar. 2.

Janeshwar Singh, son of Late Ram Sigasan Singh, Resident of VillageSadokhar, P.S.- Chenari, District- Rohtas (Sasaram), Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary of the Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas (Sasaram).

5.

The Deputy Collector Commissioner of Land Reform, Sasaram, DistrictRohtas. 6.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Sasaram, District- Rohtas. 7.

The Additional Collector, Rohtas-cum- Public Grievances Redressal Officer, Rohtas (Sasaram).

8.

The Circle Officer, Chenari, District- Rohtas. 9.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat, Sadokhar, P.S.- Chenari, District- Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bibhakar Tiwary For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha ( Sc 19 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 08-05-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this writ application is being filed for issuance of appropriate writ(s), order(s), directions directing the respondents to remove the encroachment done by the unscrupulous persons of the locality upon the Government lands situated in Mauza-Sadokhar, Thana

Patna High Court CWJC No.13417 of 2022(2) dt.08-05-2023 2/2 no.500, Khata no.0351 as well as 0352 Khesra no.

1345, 825,1444,1445,1446,1447,1491,1492,1493, 1940, 382, 249, 250, 366, 377 under Block + P.S. Chenari, District-Rohtas."

Considering the nature of relief sought for in the present writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to approach the Respondent authorities for redressal of their aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U