Suresh Bhuiyan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49822 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2012 Thana- DUMARIYA District- Gaya ====================================================== Suresh Bhuiyan S/o- Khiru Bhuiyan Village- Kendua Tand PS-Dumariya Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vijay Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard Mr. Mahendra Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Dumariya P.S. Case No. 35 of 2012 for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 324, 353, 325, 326, 307, 302, 435, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act and Section 3, 4, 5 of Explosive Substance and Section 10, 11, 13(i), 13(ii) of U.A.P. Act.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that on information that the extremists have gathered near a hill, Police reached there when mines explosion started which followed indiscriminate firing. The Police men were injured, the extremists ensured that another explosion take place which resulted into the Jeep falling in the ditch causing injury to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49822 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/2 Police persons. Later, the area was found and dead body of the extremist was found along with the incriminating materials. This led to the FIR.
4. Though learned counsel for the petitioner tried to impress upon this Court about his innocence submitting that he never came to know about it, learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that the matter is of the year 2012 and 12 years later, he was arrested.
5. Considering the submissions of the parties as also the belated coming into judicial custody, in such a serious matter, it would be appropriate that the petitioner faces trial. The bail application is rejected.
6. In view of the fact that finally, the petitioner has come into judicial custody, the Trial Court is directed to speed up the trial and see to it that it comes to a logical conclusion. (Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U T