Vivekanand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2134 of 2015 ====================================================== Vivekanand Yadav son of Late Sadhusharan Yadav Resident of MohllDakra, Satkhajuria, P.O- Heru Diara P.S- Naya Ram Nagar, DistrictMunger. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary Minor Irrigation Department, New Secretariat, Patna.

2. Engineer in Chief, Minor Irrigation, Department Visheshwaraiya Bhawan, Patna.

3. Superintending Engineer, Minor Irrigation, Dept. Munger, DistrictMunger.

4. Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, District- Lakhisarai. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Suman Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Pawan Kumar, A.C. to GA-8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 12-01-2016 Heard Mr. Suman Kumar Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Pawan Kumar, learned Assistant Counsel to Government Advocate No.8, appearing for the respondents.

After some arguments, Mr. Suman Kumar Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application, made, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, with liberty to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as

Patna High Court CWJC No.2134 of 2015 (2) dt.12-01-2016 2/2 may be permissible.

No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present writ petition. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U