Bhuwaneshwar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2829 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2649 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Bhuwaneshwar Prasad son of late Gupteshwar Prasad resident of Village Dekuli Chhotaka Sheo, Post Office Dekuli, Police Station Brahampur, District- Buxar.

2.

Ramehwar Chaubey son of late Shriram Kailash Choubey resident of Village Mahuli, Post Office Gajranjganj, Police Station Udwantnagar, District Bhojpur at Ara.

3.

Kamakhya Narayan Singh son of late Bindeshwari Singh resident of Village and Post Office Sanhagi, Police Station Garhani, District- Bhojpur at Ara. 4.

Nandji Singh son of Shri Ram Pravesh Singh resident of Village and Post Office Sanhagi, Police Station Garhani, District Bhojpur at Ara. 5.

Vijay Kumar Singh son of Shri Janardan Singh resident of Village and Post Office Panwari, Police Station Sikarhatta, District Bhojpur at Ara. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. Jitendra Shrivava, Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Visheshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2.

Mr. Ankesh Kumar, the Chief Engineer, Mechanical, Public Health Engineering Department, Visheshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Lalan Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Vishwambhar Prasad AC to AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 10-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Alleging non-compliance of this Court's order dated 07-03-2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 2649 of 2016 (Annexure-1) the present contempt application has been filed. Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that order dated 06-12-2022 (Annexure-B to the show cause filed on

Patna High Court MJC No.2829 of 2019(4) dt.10-05-2023 2/2 behalf of the opposite party Nos.1 & 2) has been passed by the authorities in compliance of the writ Court's order. In view of the substantial compliance, this Court is not inclined to proceed any further in the contempt proceedings. Petitioner's counsel, however, submits that the order does not take care of the petitioner's grievance, the petitioner, therefore, may assail the order in appropriate proceedings. With liberty, as prayed for by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the application is dismissed. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) shyambihari/- U