Patna High CourtCWJC/9486/2016disposed

Ganesh Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-24Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9486 of 2016 =========================================================== Ganesh Manjhi son of -Vishwanath Manjhi Resident of Village-Pathara,P.O.+P.S. - Manjhi,District-Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Department, Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran at Chhapra.

3. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj.

4. The District Education Officer, Gopalganj

5. The District Programme Officer, (Establishment),Gopalganj

6. The Block Education Extension Officer, Manhagarh ,Gopalganj

7. The Headmaster Kastoorba Gandhi Balika Vidyalay, Manjha, Gopalganj .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shafiur Rahman, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Harish Kumar, GP-8 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The petitioner has moved the Court for the following reliefs:

"(i) To allow the petitioner to make his attendance on attendance register who is illegally and forcibly being presented from making his attendance on the School attendance register despite being present on duty every day.

(ii) To pay the wages/allowance/salary of the petitioner for the period from 20.02.2012 till today. (iii) To stop the respondents from making fresh appointment on the post of petitioner who is working from the last five years on the post of Peon in the instant School.

(iv) To any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is legally entitled."

Patna High Court CWJC No.9486 of 2016 dt.24-08-2017 2/2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for the said relief, he has filed petition before the respondents no. 2, 3, 4 and 5, but still no order has been passed. It was submitted that the respondent no. 5, is the person, who is required to take a decision in the matter.

4. Learned counsel for the State submitted that decision would be taken expeditiously.

5. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off with direction to the respondent no. 5 to pass reasoned order on the representation filed by the petitioner expeditiously and latest within a period of three weeks from the date of production of a copy of this order before him.

6. If any payment is to be made to the petitioner, in terms of the said order, the same shall also be made within the next three weeks.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U