← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2439/2015dismissed

Abhishek Kumar Sharma And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-10Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2439 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Abhishek Kumar Sharma Son of Shri Gopal Sharma Resident of Village Amirbigha, P.S. Madanpur in the district of Aurangabad, presently resident at village Jhumari Tilaya, P.S. Jhumari Tilaya, in the district of Kodarma (Jharkhand)

2. Manish Kumar Son of Shri Nagendra Thakur, Resident of village Ketari, P.S. Gurua, in the district of Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Home Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna

3. The Additional Director General, Bihar Military Police, Patna , Bihar.

4. The Commandant, Bihar Military Police -10, Patna , Bihar.

5. The Assistant Public Information Official cum Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bihar Military Police 10, Patna, Bihar.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh, AC to AAG 10 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 10-02-2015 A hearsay or a newspaper can never form the basis for interfering with a selection, which was made way back in the year 2011. This Court is not convinced after hearing the petitioner that a case is made out for a direction to annul the selection or result contained in Annexure- 4 dated 14.10.2011 because the appointments have already been made way back.

Such belated kind of assertion of right cannot be interfered casually. If the petitioner can procure evidence of the socalled allegation of wrong doing for which he has demanded inputs

Patna High Court CWJC No.2439 of 2015 dt.10-02-2015 2/2 under RTI, he can surely revert to the Court or approach the authority. In absence of any clinching evidence, no interference is warranted at this stage at least.

Writ is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U