Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62144/2025bail rejected

Amar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-19Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62144 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-778 Year-2022 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== Amar Kumar S/o Pyare Mohan Mishra @ Pyara Mohan Mishra Vill.- Dhaniya Bagicha, P.S. Tekari, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Nafisu Zzoha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 364, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on 15.11.2022, father of informant went to market on his motorcycle but did not return. Informant believes that some unknown persons kidnapped the father of informant with intention to kill him.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62144 of 2025(3) dt.19-11-2025 2/2 basis of confessional statement of co-accused Manju Devi. Save and except confessional statement, there is no material on record to show the complicity of this petitioner in the alleged offence. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that name of petitioner transpired in this case during course of investigation and there is sufficient material to show that this petitioner, along with other accused persons, killed the father of informant.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, gravity of offence and materials that have surfaced during course of investigation, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T