Anupam Kumar Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14875 of 2015 (2) dt.10-04-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14875 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -650 Year- 2013 Thana -BHOJPUR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBHOJPUR ======================================================

1. Anupam Kumar Singh S/o Birendra Singh Resident of Village Danwar, P.S. Kachhwa, District Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Monika Devi D/o Surendra Singh Resident of Village Dakshin Ekawna, P.O. Dakshin Ekwna, P.S. Udwant Nagar, District Bhojpur. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 10.04.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner happens to be husband of the complainant and stand of the petitioner is that he is still ready to keep complainant with full honour and dignity.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this anticipatory bail stands disposed of with direction to petitioner to surrender before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara/ concerned court in connection with Complaint case no. 650C/2013, Tr. no. 3734/2014 within four weeks from the date of receipt /production of a copy of this order and seek regular bail and if petitioner does so, the concerned court shall release the petitioner on provisional bail on the day of his surrender for a period of four months on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14875 of 2015 (2) dt.10-04-2015 the like amount each to his satisfaction.

Furthermore, after being released the petitioner on provisional bail, the concerned court shall issue notice to the petitioner as well as complainant fixing a date for reconciliation and shall take all possible steps to patch up the dispute of the parties and in the above stated attempt, if the concerned court succeeds to patch up the dispute of the parties, the concerned court shall pass order for confirmation of bail of the petitioner but if the concerned court fails due to rigid approach of the petitioner, then, in that event, provisional bail of the petitioner will not be confirmed by the court below and in that event, petitioner shall be taken into custody and his regular bail application shall be decided by the concerned court on its own merit. It goes without saying that if the aforesaid effort fails on account of rigid and non-cooperative approach of the complainant, the provisional bail of the petitioner shall be confirmed by the court below itself.

Shahid ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.) U T