Ranjeet Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17340 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -371 Year- 2014 Thana -BIDUPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Ranjeet Bhagat son of Late Raghuvans Bhagat, resident of villageJarawanpur Gopalpur, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali at Hajipur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Navjot Yeshu, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. L.K.Sharma(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 25-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Having regard to the nature of allegation against the petitioner for offence under Sections 341, 323, 379, 447, 354 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and the fact that whatever allegation of assault has been made against the petitioner is with respect to a boundary dispute between the parties and that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as well as the injury given by him was only a single lacerated injury without having any ingredient of repetition, this Court, taking into account that the petitioner has also got no criminal antecedent, would direct that if the petitioner, namely, Ranjeet Bhagat surrenders before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Bidupur P.S.Case No. 371 of 2014, subject to the following

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17340 of 2015 (3) dt.25-06-2015 2/2 conditions:

(i) That both the bailors will be close family relatives of the petitioner, who will undertake an affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioner. The bailors will also undertake to inform the court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

(ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail.

(iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned, if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of his bail on the ground of misuse.

(iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each and every date in course of trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled on this ground alone.

(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Sujit/- U