Dhuri Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52335 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2025 Thana- KHUSRUPUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
Dhuri Singh, aged about 70 years, male, S/o Late Dahu Singh; 2.
Bhushan Singh @ Ram Lakhan Singh, aged about 50 years, male, S/o Binda Singh;
Both are R/o Village- Lodipur, Mansurpur, P.S.- Khushrupur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ram Nibash Prasad, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Khushrupur P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025, dated 27.01.2025, instituted for the offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1) & 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
2/4
3. The prosecution case is based on the fardbeyan statement of one Uday Singh recorded at N.M.C.H., Patna on 27.01.2025. It is alleged that the family members of the informant were attacked at their home by 23 FIR-named accused persons with deadly weapons. Co-accused Piyush Kumar, Pappu Singh, Gautam Kumar and Rakesh Kumar fired from their katta. His son, namely, Amol Kumar was shot by one of the coaccused persons, namely, Gautam Kumar from his rifle. Aforesaid Amol Kumar had sustained a gunshot injury and died on the way to N.M.C.H., Patna for treatment.
4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are in custody since 28.03.2025 and have one criminal antecedent against them, wherein they are on bail.
5. It has further been submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case due to earlier dispute and there is no specific allegation against them. The only allegation against the petitioners is that
3/4 they were members of the unlawful assembly. The petitioner No. 1 is more than 70 years old suffering from various old age disease.
6. The learned counsel for the petitioners has also submitted that one of the co-accused persons, namely, Naresh Singh has been granted regular bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 31.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 49359 of 2025.
7. The learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
8. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody of the petitioners as also grant of bail to the other similarly situated accused person referred to above, let the petitioners, above-named, be released on bail on their furnishing bail-bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial MagistrateIst Class, Patna City, Patna, in connection with
4/4 Khushrupur P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025.
9. The application stands allowed.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Praveen-II/- U T