Sushma Kumari v. The State Of Bihar Through Chief Secretary,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1917 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19162 of 2015 ====================================================== Sushma Kumari Daughter of Late Om Prakash Resident of Shukul Gali, Shvijganj, P.S. and District Bhojpur at Ara, presntly residing at L.B.S. Path, Police Colony, P.S. Anisabad, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna- Sri Tripurari Sharan, IAS.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Bihar, Patna 3.

The Director - in - Chief, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar - Dr. Navin Chandra Prasad.

4.

The Joint Director - Cum- State Programme Officer, Bihar Dr. S.S. Pandey. 5.

The Joint Director, Health Services, Bihar, Patna - Dr. S.S. Pandey. 6.

The District Magistrate, Bhojpur - Sir Raushan Kushwaha, IAS 7.

The Chief Medical Officer - cum- Civil Surgeon, Bhojpur, Dr. Laliteshwar Prasad Jha.

8.

The District Leprosy Eradication Officer, Bhojpur - Dr. Binod Kumar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.S.D. Yadav(Aag 9) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 11-03-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

(i) for initiating a proceeding of contempt as well also inflicting suitable punishment to the opposite parties for causing willful, deliberate disobedience for non-compliance

Patna High Court MJC No.1917 of 2021(2) dt.11-03-2026 2/2 of order/judgment dated 30.04.2019, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 19162 of 2015, by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad (as His Lordship then was).

3. The show cause of the opposite party as AnnexureA showing the reasoned order passed by the Head of Leprosy Department, Health Services, Bihar, Patna communicated vide memo no. 32 dated 20.01.2022 to show that the claim of the petitioner has been negated.

4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, the contempt petition is disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U