Vinay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5680 of 2014 =========================================================== Vinay Kumar, Son Of Late Navdipan Sharma, Resident Of Village Kundila, Post Ratni Bazar, District Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar, Through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

2. District Programme Officer, Jehanabad

3. Block Education Officer, Ratni Faridpur, Jehanabad

4. Selection Committee, Through Block Education Officer Ratni Faridpur, Jehanabad

5. District Teacher Employment Appellate Tribunal, Though Its Member, Jehanabad .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan For the Respondent/s : Mr. GP4- Uma Shankar =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 01-03-2016 The tribunal has committed no wrong by declaring that a person with a degree in Sanskrit, which may be equivalent, can only be appointed against a vacancy existing for a Sanskrit Teacher. The equivalence does not mean that a person with Sanskrit will get appointed as a general teacher, wherever he can be fitted. There is nothing erroneous with the decision, dated 12.06.2012, passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Jehanabad.

Writ application is dismissed, accordingly.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) SKM/- U