Ram Bhajan Mahto v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Governmen
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.402 of 2017 ====================================================== Ram Bhajan Mahto S/o - Ram Briksha Mahto R/v - Mahavir, P.O. - Pipra, Naurangiya, Distt. - West Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar Through Sri R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Governmen
2. Sri Azad Hind, the Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. Major K.N. Sahay, the Deputy Director, T.B.D.C., Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. Sri Uma Shankar Pathak, the Deputy Director, Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5. Ramautar Prasad, B.C.G. Technician-Cum-Typist T.B.D.C. Headquarter, Agam Kuan, Patna - 7 posted as
6. Ratindra Prasad Yadav, Lab Technician T.B.D.C. Headquarter, Agam Kuan, Patna - 7 posted as a Lab Te
7. Ram Narayan Mistri S/o - Jawahar Mistri R/v - Chiraiyatar, Postal Park, Road No. - 3B, P.S. - Jakkanpur, Distt. - Patna posted as a Male Ward Attendent at Section - 4, Headquarter, Health Services, New Secretariat, Government of Bihar, Patna.
... ... Opp. Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vijay Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s :
Mr. S. D. Yadav, AAG9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel for the State submits the respondents have considered the case of the petitioner and passed the order contained in Memo No. 235 (11) dated 1.4.2017 (Annexure-A) which is not in favour of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will challenge the aforesaid order in a substantive writ application. In that view of the matter, the present contempt
Patna High Court MJC No.402 of 2017(3) dt.16-01-2019 2/2 proceeding has been rendered infructuous.
The petitioner, if so advised, may take steps against the aforesaid order dated 1.4.2017 passed against him. (Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U