Rajendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56465 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2024 Thana- SIDHWALIYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Rajendra Yadav Son of Late Narayan Yadav R/O Vill.- Supauli, P.s.- Sidhwaliya, Dist.- Gopalganj 2.

Sanju Devi Wife of Rajendra Yadav R/O Vill.- Supauli, P.s.- Sidhwaliya, Dist.- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-09-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 427, 307, 353, 332, 333, 507 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no.2 is a woman and the informant alleges that the accused persons including the petitioners obstructed the informant in discharge of his official duty and also pelted stones and damaged the police vehicles and even threw stones at the door of Saroj Sahni.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56465 of 2024(2) dt.23-09-2024 2/2 the petitioners have been falsely implicated by the informant in the instant case. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that the same has been instituted against 18 named accused persons and 20-25 unknown and there is no specific allegation against the petitioners rather the allegation of pelting stones and damaging the police vehicles is general and omnibus in nature.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sidhwaliya P.S. Case No.02/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T