Patna High CourtCWJC/7235/2016disposed

Baidya Nath Prasad Roy v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-04-09Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7235 of 2016 ====================================================== Baidya Nath Prasad Roy S/o Raghunandan Roy Resident of Suraha Basantpur PS Hasanpur, District Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary Human Resource Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Primary Education Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate Samastipur, Dist Samastipur.

5. The District Education Officer Samastipur, Dist Samastipur.

6. The District Programe Officer Samastipur, District Samastipur.

7. The Block Development Officer Hasanpur, District Samastipur.

8. The Block Education Officer Hasanpur, Dist Samastipur.

9. The Pramukh of the Block Samitte Hasanpur, Dist Samastipur.

10. The Secretary Block Samitte Hasanpur Distt Samastipur

11. Sri Mahamaya Prasad S/o Thakkan Chaudhary Resident of Prakhand Teacher, Utkarmit Middle school Sarhachiya, PS Hasanpur, Dist Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Gp22- Gyan Prakash Ojha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 09-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

In view of the fact that the State Appellate Authority is now functional, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition in order to file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority.

Permission is granted.

In case the petitioner files an appeal before the State Appellate Authority within a period of one month from today along with a copy of this order, the State Appellate Authority is

Patna High Court CWJC No.7235 of 2016(2) dt.09-04-2018 2/2 required to decide the appeal on its own merit after condoning the delay in filing the appeal in view of the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the writ petition for the same relief before this Court.

With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U