← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51855/2022bail granted

Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-13Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51855 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2021 Thana- DIDARGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

ANIL KUMAR S/o Deo Narayan Singh Resident of Village- Hiranandpur, P.S.- Didarganj, District- Patna.

2.

Dwarika Singh S/o Late Jai Kishun Singh Resident of Village- Hiranandpur, P.S.- Didarganj, District- Patna.

3.

Dinanath Rai S/o Late Jai Kishun Singh Resident of Village- Hiranandpur, P.S.- Didarganj, District- Patna.

4.

Sudhir Kumar S/o Dwarika Singh Resident of Village- Hiranandpur, P.S.- Didarganj, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 323, 387, 420 and some other ancillary Sections of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, these petitioners along with other accused persons are alleged to have abused the informant, demanded Rangdari and also committed Mar-pit with him.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51855 of 2022(7) dt.13-07-2023 2/2 the case. It is further submitted that specific accusation of assault is against co-accused, Suresh Prasad and so far these petitioners are concerned, accusation is general and omnibus. All the Sections are bailable except Section 387 & 420 of the IPC which are not attributed to these petitioners. Learned counsel appearing for the State an the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. Considering the facts of the case and nature of accusation against the petitioners, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in connection with Didarganj PS case No. 104/ 2021, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr. P. C.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T