← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6558/2016dfd for non appearance

Belal Ahmad And ANR. v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-10-30Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33233 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -472 Year- 2011 Thana -GAYA COMPLAINT CASE District- GAYA ====================================================== Eqbal Ahmad @ Ikbal Ahmad son of Late Khurshid Ahmad , Resident of Jamal Manzil , Khairat Ahmad Road , Murarpur , P.S.Kotwali ,District - Gaya .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .

2. Md. Aslam , son of Zearat Hussian , Resident of Mohalla -Main Road , Murarpur , P.S . -Kotwali , District -Gaya .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.6558 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -472 Year- 2011 Thana -GAYA COMPLAINT CASE District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Belal Ahmad Son of Late Khurshid Ahmad, Resident of Jamat Manjil, Khairat Ahmad Road, Murarpur, P.S. - Kotwali, District - Gaya.

2. Afaque Ahmad, Son of Late Khurshid Ahmad, Resident of Jamai Manjil Khairat Ahmad Road, Murarpur, P.S. - Kotwali, District - Gaya. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Md. Aslam, Son of Zearat Hussain, Resident of Mohalla - Mani Road, Murarpur, P.S. - Kotwali, District - Gaya.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.33233 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s :

For the Opposite Party/s :

(In Cr.Misc. No.6558 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s :

For the Opposite Party/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 30-10-2017 None appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this application while the learned counsel appearing on behalf of O.P. No.2 and learned A.P.P. are present. On 09.10.2017, on the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33233 of 2014 (7) dt.30-10-2017 2/2 prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner, case was adjourned for two weeks giving time by way of last chance. Under the aforesaid circumstances, these applications are dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U