Patna High CourtCWJC/3776/2016disposed

Sushil Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-10-11Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3776 of 2016 ====================================================== Sushil Kumar Sinha Son of Late Awdesh Bihari Lal, residence of C/o Ajay Kumar Sinha L.I.G. Colony Quarter No. 84, P.S.- Agam Kuan, Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram

3. The Treasury Officer, Patna

4. The Allahabad Bank, Main Branch, Patna

5. The District Soil Conservation Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram

6. The Accountant General Bihar at Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri For the Respondent/State : G.P. 15 For A.G. Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan Mr. Niraj Kumar For Bank : Mr. Nish Nath Ojha, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 11-10-2017 Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in the cause title of the writ application. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the Bank.

The dispute is confined to payment of revised pension in terms of revised pay scales of 6th PRC. The respondent no.6 has filed supplementary counter affidavit dated 14.09.2017 enclosing a letter contained memo no. 1924 dated 28.11.2016 which indicates that the Treasury Officer, Sachiwalaya, Sichai

Patna High Court CWJC No.3776 of 2016 (4) dt.11-10-2017 2/2 Bhawan, Patna has been requested to Assistant General Manager, Allahabad Bank to ensure payment of revised pension in terms of 6th Pay Revision Committee Recommendation in view of the letter dated 28.11.2016. The bank is required to ensure payment of all arrears of revised pension in accordance with the entitlement of the petitioner as per 6th Pay Revision Committee. Accordingly, the Bank is directed to see that payment is made to the petitioner in terms of letter contained memo no. 1924 dated 28.11.2016 within a period of one month from the date of production/receipt of the order passed in this case particularly respondent no.4.

With the aforesaid observation, the application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U