Avinash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3674 of 2016 ====================================================== Avinash Kumar son of Rajeshwar Prasad Singh, resident of Village-Samho, P.O- Samho, P.S.- Samho, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna.
2. The Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna.
3. The District Magistrate (D.M.) Lakhisarai.
4. The Excise Superintendent, Lakhisarai.
5. The District Treasury Officer, Lakhisarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Jha, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. LALIT KISHORE- PAAG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 06-11-2017 Inter alia claiming refund of Rs.1,16,630/- and Rs.54,880/- deposited by the petitioner on various dates, so also a sum of Rs.61,750/- to the Excise Department at Lakhisarai for grant of Excise contract and seeking refund of the amount the writ petition has been filed.
Respondents have filed a counter affidavit and in para 4 of the same they say that on account of want of necessary documents, as called for, the claim of the petitioner has not been settled.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3674 of 2016 dt.06-11-2017 2/2 For the present, without entering into the controversy on merit, we direct that on the petitioner filing an application seeking refund of the amount along with necessary documents, the competent authority shall consider and decide the question of refund in accordance with law within sixty days of presentation of the application along with a copy of this order. With the aforesaid liberty, this application is disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.Jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 8.11.2017 Transmission Date