Jitendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51539 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2015 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== Jitendra Yadav Son of Darogi Yadav Resident of Village - Kajur, Sukhe Bigha, P.S.- Atri, District - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 75 of 2015 dated 04.06.2015 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 353, 427, 395 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant got information about an altercation between two parties. When the police party reached there, in the meantime, the petitioner and the coaccused persons along with 100-150 unknown miscreants armed with pistol, lathi and danda assaulted the police party and snatched service rifle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51539 of 2025(2) dt.29-08-2025 2/3 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Local Chowkidar disclosed the name of the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused has already been granted anticipatory bail by the co-ordinate bench of this court vide order dated 25.01.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 749 of 2019. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Gaya in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 75 of 2015, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with further condition/s:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51539 of 2025(2) dt.29-08-2025 3/3 failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner are liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T