Mukesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49546 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -112 Year- 2018 Thana -DARAUNDHA District- SIWAN ====================================================== Mukesh Yadav, Son of Ganesh Yadav @ Ganesh Rai, Resident of VillageBal Bangra, Police Station- Daraunda, District- Siwan. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 272, 273, 414 of the IPC, 30(a) and 38 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 269.865 liters wine is said to have been recovered.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that total 269.865 liters wine is recovered from half constructed house belongs to joint family of the petitioner. The name of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49546 of 2018 (2) dt.10-08-2018 2/2 petitioner has come in the present case on the basis of alleged recovery made from half constructed house belongs to joint family of the petitioner. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Siwan, in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 112 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T