Ajay Kumar And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1588 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3489 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Ajay Kumar son of Late Anirudh Prasad Yadav resident of Lohiya Nagar, Madhepura presently residing at village Sahugadh, Police Station Madhepura, District Madhepura.

2. Mukesh Kumar Singh son of Sri Raj Kishore Singh Proprietor of M/S Jai Shiv Construction, resident of village near Congress Office, Supaul, Police Station Supaul, District Supaul.

3. Laxman Lal Poddar son of Late Tanuk Lal Poddar Proprietor of M/S Pankaj Construction, resident of Supaul Ward No. 1, Police Station Supaul, District - Supaul.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Water Resource (Minor Irrigation), Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri Mihir Kumar Singh, Principal Secretary, Department of Water Resource (Minor Irrigation), Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Narayan Paswan, the Project Co-ordinator-cum-the Chief Engineer (North) Tubewel Division, Muzaffarpur Gandak Colony, Muzaffarpur.

4. Sri Kameshwar Chaudhary, the Superintending Engineer, Tubewel Circle, Purnea.

5. Sri Banwari Singh, the Executive Engineer, Tubewel Division, Madhepura.

6. Sri Ranjeet Kumar, the Assistant Engineer, Tubewel Sub-Division, Madhepura.

7. Sri Ramdhani Sahu, the Junior Engineer, Tubewel Sub-Division, Madhepura.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 30-06-2017 In view of the show cause filed by the respondents and the action for settling the claim of the petitioner, as is evident from the order dated 29.12.2014, Annexure A series filed along with the show cause, no further action is required to be taken.

In case the petitioners are aggrieved with the

Patna High Court MJC No.1588 of 2014 (6) dt.30-06-2017 2/2 manner in which the calculation has been done and payments made, they may claim further benefits by challenging the same in accordance with law in an appropriate proceeding. With the aforesaid, this application is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) K.C.jha/- U