Pintu Rai @ Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54501 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-809 Year-2023 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Pintu Rai @ Pintu Kumar S/O Prahalad Rai, Resident of village- Bishunpura Nayatola, P.O.- Gultenganj, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, Dist- Saran, Bihar- 841211 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramkishor Singh, Advocate Mr. Sumit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3. As per F.I.R., the informant's daughter Sunita Devi got married with the petitioner. The in-laws of Sunita Devi used to demand motorcycle and money and due to nonfulfilment of demand they used to torture and harass her. The petitioner in drunken state used to assault her. On 03.10.2023, the informant got information that her daughter Sunita Devi has been killed. On the said information, the informant and her family members went to the in-laws' house of Sunita Devi but no one was found in the house. The informant expressed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54501 of 2025(3) dt.01-12-2025 2/2 suspicion in the F.I.R. that all the accused persons had killed her daughter and disappeared her dead body.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased. He further submits that as a matter of fact, the daughter of the informant was not happy with the marriage and, therefore, she left the house without giving any information. Till date, dead body of the daughter of the informant has not been traced. Charges have already been framed and the petitioner is in custody since 29.04.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, the facts and circumstances of the case and also the period of custody, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chapra, Saran in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 809 of 2023.

P.K.P./- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U