← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11898/2024dismissed

Santosh Kumar v. The Union Of India Through The Principal Secretary,

2024-08-08Mr. Justice Nani Tagia2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11898 of 2024 ====================================================== Santosh Kumar S/o- Ram Prayag Singh, R/o- vill- Adalpur @ Adilnagar, P.S.- Jandaha, Dist.- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Principal Secretary, Department of Defence, New Delhi.

2.

The Honorary Secretary, Sainik School Society, Room No. 108 (A), South Block, New Delhi- 110011.

3.

The Inspecting Officer (RK), Sainik School Society, Room No. 101, D-1 Wing, Sena Bhawan, DHQ Post, New Delhi- 110011. 4.

The Chairman LBA, Sainik School, East Siang and GOC 56, Infantry Division, East Siang, Pin-908456, C/O 99 APO. 5.

The Principal, Sainik School East Siang, Vill- Niglok, P.O. and P.S.- Ruksin, Dist- East Siang, Arunchal Prasad - 791102.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No.II, Advocate Mr. Pranav Kumar, Advocate Smt. Kumari Rupa, Advocate Smt. Priyanka Kumari, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Additional Solicitor General ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. By means of this writ petition the petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondent No. 5 to accept the joining of the petitioner and allow him to resume his duty as General Employee (Multi Tasking Staff) in the school of respondent No.5.

3. The respondent No. 5 is the Principal, Sainik School East Siang, Village-Niglok, P.O & P.S.-Ruksin, District-

Patna High Court CWJC No.11898 of 2024(2) dt.08-08-2024 2/2 East Siang, Arunachal Pradesh.

4. Since the petitioner is seeking an employment in a school situated in the State of Arunachal Pradesh, I am of the view that this Court does not have the jurisdiction to entertain this writ petition.

5. This writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as lacking in jurisdiction.

(Nani Tagia, J) Nishant/- U