Lal Mohan Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6780 of 2015 ====================================================== Lal Mohan Rai son of Late Anandi Rai resident of village- Nari Khurd, P.S.- Jandaha, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resorces Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Department of Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Vaishali.

4. The District Education officer, Vaishali.

5. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Vaishali.

6. The Principal Nirsoo Narayan College, Singhwara, District- Vaishali, namely Birendra Kumar Singh.

7. The Secretary, Managing Committee, Nirsoo Narayan College, Singhwara, District- Vaishali, namely Laxmi Narayan Singh. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent State: Mr. Ashok Kumar Choudhary, AAG-13 Mr. Avanindra Kumar Jha, AC to AAG-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 13-01-2016 Heard Mr. PramodMishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Ashok Kumar Choudhary, learned Additional Advocate General No.13, appearing for the State respondents. After some arguments, Mr. Pramod Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application, made, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, with liberty to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so

Patna High Court CWJC No.6780 of 2015 (2) dt.13-01-2016 2/2 advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present writ petition. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U