← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13634/2022dismissed

Shubham Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-13Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13634 of 2022 ====================================================== Shubham Kumari Daughter of Sri Shashi Nath Pandey, Wife of Vikash Kumar, Resident of Mohalla-Chanakyapuri, Road No. 3, House No. -208, M.I.T. Muzaffarpur, District-Muzaffarpur, PIN-842003, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Home Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Chairman, Bihar Police Subordinate Services Commission, Patna. 3.

The Secretary, Bihar Police Subordinate Services Commission, Patna. 4.

The Special Executive Officer Bihar Police Subordinate Services Commission, Patna.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Dinu Kumar, Advocate Mr.Dr. Mahtab Ahmad, Advocate Mr.Prabhakar Nath Rai, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Nasrul Hoda Khan, SC-1 Mr.Md. Irshad, AC to SC-1 For the BPSCC :

Mr.Nishant Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 13-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Bihar Police Subordinate Services Commission, Patna.

Petitioner is aggrieved by the result of the Police SubInspector and Police Sargent published on 14.07.2022 in connection with advertisement bearing no. 03/2020. On perusal of the writ application, it appears that the petitioner has not challenged the result and no prayer for quashing of the same has been made.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner should have got more than the cut-off marks declared

Patna High Court CWJC No.13634 of 2022(2) dt.13-04-2023 2/2 for the unreserved category (female). She is looking for reverification of her answer books. Learned counsel for the State however submits that the selection process under advertisement no. 03/2020 is over and there is no provision for re-verification or re-evaluation of the answer sheets.

Having regard to the materials available on the record and in the nature of the submissions, this Court finds no reason to issue any direction to the respondents.

This writ application is dismissed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) Rajeev/- U