Nitilal Chaudhary @ Netilal Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50465 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2026 Thana- SATHI District- West Champaran ====================================================== Nitilal Chaudhary @ Netilal Chaudhary S/o Late Sukai Chaudhary Resident of Village - Ram Prasauna, Ps - Sathi, Dist. - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sathi P.S. Case No. 100 of 2026 instituted for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3.

As per prosecution case, it is alleged that petitioner has given order to assault the son of the informant to coaccused, Dharamnath Chaudhary. 4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 26.04.2026. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50465 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/2 5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. From perusal of the FIR, it would reveal that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, rather the same is against other co-accused person. Specific allegation of assault is against co-accused, Dharamnath Chaudhary. Injury of the injured is found to be simple in nature. There is case and counter case between the parties.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and there being no specific allegation against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sathi P.S. Case No. 100 of 2026.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T