Kalu Lal @ Golu @ Vivek Lal @ Golu Lal @ Kallu Lal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52308 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2025 Thana- Bahoranpur District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.
Kalu Lal @ Golu @ Vivek Lal @ Golu Lal @ Kallu Lal Son of Shambhu Lal @ Shambhu Lal Srivastava Village- Paharpur, Ps- Bahoranur, DistBhojpur 2.
Shambhu Lal @ Shambhu Lal Srivastava son of Late Ramji Lal VillagePaharpur, Ps- Bahoranur, Dist- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Shweta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 118(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that the accused persons came to his shop and started abusing, on objection, Golu Lal assaulted him by Lathi causing injury on his hand. Further, when the informant tried to flee, Amit Lal assaulted him by means of Dao made of iron causing injury on his back. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52308 of 2025(2) dt.02-09-2025 2/2 implicated. It is next submitted that the petitioners are father and son. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the allegation of assault is not on vital part of the body and petitioner no.2 has been implicated in the case as an order giver.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, let petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Bahoranpur P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T