Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24222/2014disposed

Chandra Mani Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-08-24Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24222 of 2014 Arising Out of P.S.Case No. -2012 Year- 2013 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- BANKA =========================================================== Chandra Mani Kumar son of Krishnandan Prasad, Resident of Village- Majitpur, P.S.- Manpur, District- Nalanda .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Seema Devi w/o Chandra Mani Kumar, daughter of Pramod Mandal, Resident of Village- Pathra, P.S.- Barahat, District- Banka .... .... Opposite Parties =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party No.2 : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-08-2017 This application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the order dated 21.01.2014 passed by SDJM, Banka in Complaint Case No.2012/2013/Trial No.1448 of 2014 whereunder the court below finding primafacie case for the offence under Sections 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act ordered for issuance of summons against the petitioner.

2. Heard and perused the record.

3. Petitioner is husband of Opposite Party No.2. His marriage was performed on 24.05.2013. The petitioner's bail was allowed on account of compromise between the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the parties have compromised the case and they are residing together at Pune where the petitioner is in service. In such circumstance, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the petition on merit.

4. The learned APP submitted that the lower court may be directed to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24222 of 2014 dt.24-08-2017 2/2 get the case disposed of at the earliest in the light of restoration of good relation between the spouses.

5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this criminal miscellaneous application is dismissed as not pressed.

6. However, it is observed that the court below in view of submission of both the parties, shall dispose of the case at the earliest. (Sanjay Kumar, J) B.Kr./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 29.08.2017 Transmission Date 29.08.2017