Kavindra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50941 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2018 Thana- KARAI PARSURAI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Kavindra Kumar Son of Binda Prasad Yadav@ Binda Prasad Resident of Village- Ashrafpur, P.S. Dhanarua, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashank Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Karai Parshurai P.S. Case No. 41 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b), 26/35 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 5 cartridges and one mobile phone.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It has been further submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 10.05.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50941 of 2018(2) dt.03-10-2018 2/2 Judicial Magistrate-1st, Hilsa at Nalanda, in connection with Karai Parshurai P.S. Case No. 41 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U