Saud Ansari @ Sahud Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57361 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2022 Thana- BHOJPUR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBhojpur ====================================================== Saud Ansari @ Sahud Ansari son of Saukat Ansari @ Md. Shaukat Ali Residence of Surendra Colony, Ward No. 11 Koilwar, P. S. - Koilwar, DistBhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Rajiya Khatoon wife of Saud Ansari, D/o- Manjar Kalimullah VillageBarahbatara Ps- Ara Town Dist- Bhojpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Navin Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP Mr. Chandra Bhushan Singh, Adv.for OP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2.
2. The petitioner, husband of opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 323, 504, 506, 498-A, 354, 406, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably through the process of mediation and both parties have agreed to live together, as husband and wife. Petitioner also
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57361 of 2024(4) dt.22-01-2025 2/3 undertakes to keep opposite party no. 2 with full respect and dignity.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 does not dispute the aforesaid contention and confirms the fact regarding the settlement entered into between the parties.
5. Here, it is relevant to mention that earlier, with consent of the parties, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of Patna High Court to explore the possibility of settlement between the parties, which has been resolved in terms of Memorandum of Agreement annexed with Mediator's report.
6. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Complaint Case No. 80(C) of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with condition that petitioner shall abide by all the terms & conditions, mentioned in Memorandum of Agreement, failing which, the learned Court below would be at liberty to cancel
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57361 of 2024(4) dt.22-01-2025 3/3 the bail-bond of petitioner."
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T