Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56118/2025dismissed

Ranjeet Paswan @ Bari Paswan @ Ranjeet v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-10Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56118 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2012 Thana- BARH District- Patna ====================================================== Ranjeet Paswan @ Bari Paswan @ Ranjeet S/o Vijay Paswan Resident of Mohalla/ Village- Kazichak, ward no 23, Barh, Police Station- Barh, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Arun, Adv Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv Mr. Karan Chand, Adv Mr. Aditya Pushkar, Adv Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Barh P.S.Case No. 01 of 2012 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 02.04.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 19512 of 2024 which reads as under:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Barh P.S.Case No.01 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56118 of 2025(4) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 2012 registered for the offence under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is the assailant of the deceased and he has given head injury to the deceased by a hard and blunt substance.

4. The petitioner is in jail since 29.01.2023.

5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is the assailant of the deceased, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner

6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

7. The court below is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and conclude the same at the earliest."

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge has been framed after separating the case of the petitioner from the absconding accused.

5. Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact that the trial has started, I am not inclined to review my earlier order.

6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) N.K/- U T