Sardar Jha @ Ravi Jha @ Ravi Kumar Jha @ Ravi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.50998 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2018 Thana- DUMRA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Sardar Jha @ Ravi Jha @ Ravi Kumar Jha @ Ravi Son of Munna Jha@ Ajay Kumar Jha Resident of Village- Bel Bairgania, P.S.- Bairgania, DistrictSitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ritesh Kumar Narain Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Kanhaiya Kishore ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in Dumra P.S. Case No. 128 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 399, 402, 413, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a, 26/35 of the Arms Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one loaded country made pistol.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has committed no offence and has been implicated in this case due to village politics. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 01.04.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50998 of 2018(2) dt.03-10-2018 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate-Sitamarhi, in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No. 128 of 2018, with following conditions:-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U