Vikash Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18372 of 2015 (4) dt.25-06-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18372 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -20 Year- 2014 Thana -NARDIGANJ District- NAWADA ====================================================== Vikash Kumar, Son of Rambali Paswan, Residence of Village + P.S.- Nardiganj, District- Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Khushbu Kumari, Wife of Vikash or D/o Suresh Paswan, Residence of Village- Bhadauni, P.S. + Distt.- Nawada .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 20 of 2014 registered under Section 498(A) and 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the husband of the complainant (opposite party no.2) and is ready to keep the complainant with full dignity and honour.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18372 of 2015 (4) dt.25-06-2015 provisional bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 20 of 2014, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

Learned trial court is directed to issue notice to the complainant (opposite party no. 2) and make attempt to resolve the dispute in between the petitioner and the complainant (opposite party no.2) by taking all possible efforts and if the dispute is resolved them confirm the provisional bail of the petitioner. If the dispute is not resolved then the trial court will pass the order on its own merit.

Accordingly, this application is disposed of. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T