Patna High CourtMJC/427/2014disposed

Gauri Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-09The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.427 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2241 of 2013 ====================================================== Guari Devi, wife of Late Rampyare Prasad, Resident of Swargawan, Biharshari, District - Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Primary Education Department, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna Through Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh.

2. Shri Ashutosh, the Director, Primary Education Department, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3. Shri Anirudh Prasad Singh, the Director-Cum-Joint Commissioner, Directorate, Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4. Shri Md. Sohail, the Collector, Jehanabad.

5. Shri Sanoj Kumar, the District Provident Fund Officer, Jehanabad, District - Jehanabad.

6. Smt. Roshan Ara, the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Jehanabad.

7. Shri Sushil Kumar, the Treasury Officer, Jehanabad.

8. Smt Roshan Ara, the Drawing & Disbursing Officer, Rajkiya Middle School Gangapur, Ghoshi, Jehanabad.

9. Shri Nand Kishore Prasad, the Head Master, Rajkiya Middle School, Gangapur, Ghoshi (Jehanabad).

10. Shri I.S.D. Dhaliwal, the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 09-08-2017 From the show cause filed by the respondents it is seen that the representation has been considered and the dues admissible and payable has been paid as is detailed in para 10 of the show cause.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, now no further action is required to be taken in the matter. In case, the petitioner

Patna High Court MJC No.427 of 2014 (2) dt.09-08-2017 2/2 has any grievance still subsisting with regard to the manner his claim has been settled, petitioner shall have liberty to assail the same afresh in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid, the application stands disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) Sunil/- U