Tulsi Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51665 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2022 Thana- NAVINAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

TULSI RAM S/O INDRADEO RAM @ INDRDEO RAM Resident of village- Gamhariya, P.S.- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad. 2.

KAMLESH RAM S/O HARI RAM Resident of village- Gamhariya, P.S.- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad.

3.

DHARMENDRA KUMAR RAM S/O TULSI RAM Resident of villageGamhariya, P.S.- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad. 4.

SANJAY RAM S/O INDERADEO RAM @ INDERDEO RAM Resident of village- Gamhariya, P.S.- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad. 5.

UPENDER RAM @ UPENDRA RAM S/O SHEOPUJAN RAM Resident of village- Gamhariya, P.S.- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad. 6.

BIRENDER RAM @ BIRENDRA RAM @ VIRENDRA KUMAR S/O NARESH RAM Resident of village- Gamhariya, P.S.- Nabinagar, DistrictAurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51665 of 2022(2) dt.13-12-2022 2/2 324, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is case and counter case betweenthe parties and both sides have sustained injuries. He submits that injuries found upon the victim are simple in nature which is clear from the impugned order. He further submits that petitioners have criminal antecedents as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 26/2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T