Vikas Kumar @ Vikas Sahani v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.26584 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -417 Year- 2015 Thana -KANTI District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Vikas Kumar @ Vikas Sahani, son of Pradeep Sahani, resident of villageBihari Bithauli, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District-Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Smt. Anuradha Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No.417 of 2015, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414/413 of the Indian Penal Code.
Earlier, the petitioner had moved before this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No.51138 of 2015 and this Court vide order dated 10.11.2015 rejected the bail application of the petitioner with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of nine months' jail custody.
The petitioner is in jail since 09.09.2015.
Looking to the period of custody, let the petitionerVikas Kumar @ Vikas Sahani be released on bail on furnishing
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26584 of 2016 (2) dt.29-06-2016 2/2 bail bonds of Rs.10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Muzaffarpur, in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No.417 of 2015 subject to the conditions that:- (i) one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner i.e. mother/father/wife/son of the petitioner;
(ii) if the petitioner is found involved in similar type of case in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the Court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and;
(iii) that the petitioner would participate in the court proceeding and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U