Ujjal Bakshi @ Ujjwal Bakshi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31275 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -8 Year- 2014 Thana -KISHANGANJ District- KISANGANJ ======================================================

1. UJJAL BAKSHI @ UJJWAL BAKSHI son of Sri Pabitra Bakshi, resident B-3/1, Amarawati Block, D-22, Police Station Ghola (Kharda) in the district of 24 Pargana, West Bengal.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 08-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 08 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 120 B of the Indian Penal Code and BPTD Act 2002.

On the basis of complaint petition this case has been registered with allegation that the petitioner and other accused persons run Woods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Woods Laboratories Ltd. which does the work of non-banking. They appointed 100 agents and the informant was also one of the agent and money were taken in good faith and on allurement of more interest or profit. They deposited the money amounting to Rs. 50,00,000/- in those accounts and Rs. 25,00,000/- in cash at Kishanganj office

but on 13th August 2013 the office was locked and the accused persons fled away.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 07.04.2016, the petitioner left the company in September, 2013 itself, he has fraudulently been included in the list of directors by making his forged signature and his documents were misused. On 16.03.2013 the petitioner complained about such forgery to ROC Kolkata as well as Patna and its copies were sent to the company. The petitioner is under medical advice of complete rest but he is suffering in custody.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that chargesheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 08 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of

the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T