Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25727/2014dismissed

Gopal Kumar @ Ajay And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-08-04Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25727 of 2014 (4) dt.04-08-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25727 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -147 Year- 2012 Thana -PURNEA SADAR District- PURNIA ===================================================

1. Gopal Kumar @ Ajay

2. Kanhaya Kumar @ Kanhaya Kumar Das

3. Sudhir Kumar @ Sudhir Kumar Das Sons of Babul Das

4. Asha Devi Wife of Babul Das

5. Basanti Devi Wife of Rajendra Das All resident of village Lal Bari, P.S.- Sadar, District- Purnea

6. Gudiya Devi @ Gauri Devi Wife of Arjun Das resident of village- Khairiya, P.S.- Korha, District- Katihar

7. Rita Devi @ Gauri Daughter of Dina Das

8. Dusiya Devi @ Tulsi Devi Wife of Dina Das Both resident of village Teja Tola Shiv Mandir, Katihar, P.S.- Katihar, DistrictKatihar .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Usha Devi Wife of Ajay Kumar @ Gopal Daughter of Kesho Das resident of village Lalbari, P.S.- Sadar, District- Katihar .... .... Opposite Party =================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None.

For the Opposite Party/s : None.

=================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

4. 04-08-2017 Perusal of the order dated 16.12.2014 would show that the due to non-compliance of the order dated 8th July, 2014 this application stood dismissed against opposite party no. 2 on 18th July, 2014.

It appears that no step has been taken for restoration of the application against the said opposite party no. 2 despite a lapse of about three

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25727 of 2014 (4) dt.04-08-2017 years approximately.

Today, when the matter was called out, no one is present either on behalf of the petitioners or on behalf of the State. In the circumstances, this Court has reason to believe that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the present application.

This application, thus, stands dismissed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) Rajeev/- U T