Chhote Lal Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48766 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -272 Year- 2016 Thana -HARSIDHI District- EASTCHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Chhote Lal Ram, Son of Hulas Ram, Supervisor Harsidhi Block, P.S.- Harsidhi District- East Champaran, resident of Dhanhar Dihuli, P.S. Ram Garwa, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jagdish Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-08-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 272/2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 307, 353, 222, 223, 224, 225 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner and as well as other accused persons is of assault to the B.D.O. and Panchayat Sewak. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that large number of persons have been made accused in this case and no specific allegation has been attributed to the petitioner. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of above facts, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48766 of 2018 (2) dt.25-08-2018 2/2 of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 272/2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T