Vinita Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51668 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2022 Thana- BUXAR District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.
VINITA RAI WIFE OF RAJEEV KUMAR RESIDENT OF B.C. KHURD, P.S. DINARA, DISTRICT ROHTAS. AT PRESENT R/O WARD NO. 1, SHIKSHAK COLONY, CHARITRAVAN, BUXAR, P.S. AND DISTRICTBUXAR-802101 2.
RAJEEV KUMAR SON OF RAMESHWAR THAKUR RESIDENT OF B.C. KHURD, P.S. DINARA, DISTRICT ROHTAS. AT PRESENT R/O WARD NO. 1, SHIKSHAK COLONY, CHARITRAVAN, BUXAR, P.S. AND DISTRICT- BUXAR-802101 ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Surendra Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 419, 406 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51668 of 2022(2) dt.13-12-2022 2/2 case. He submits that petitioner has given Rs. 17,00,000/- to the informant and informant has given the power of attorney to the petitioner. He submits that before the power of attorney the informant already sold the said land to the another person then the informant file a complaint case against the informant and there is compromise between the parties. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.
Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Buxar Town P.S. Case No.21/2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T