← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52006/2022bail granted

Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-01-09Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52006 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-405 Year-2022 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== JITENDRA KUMAR, Son of Upendra Sah, R/V- Mithanapur, Mustafaganj, P.s- Minapur, Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Hari Kishore Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 09-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 405 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 (c) and 21 (b) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

On seeing the police party, it is alleged that four persons started fleeing away. They including the petitioner have been searched. From the petitioner's possession there is alleged recovery of Smack like substance weighing 02 grams.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a case of false implication. There is no compliance with Section 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Alleged recovery is of small quantity. Petitioner has no antecedents and he is in custody since 17.05.2022. The petitioner is no in any way concerned with the other accused persons. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. It is submitted that smack has been recovered from the petitioner's possession.

Considering the rival submissions, his clean antecedents,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52006 of 2022(2) dt.09-01-2023 2/2 period of custody and the alleged recovery of small quantity from the petitioner, this Court, for the purposes of grant of bail, is inclined to accept the submissions advanced by the petitioner's counsel. Prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Ahiyapur P. S. Case No. 405 of 2022, subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) shashank/- U T