Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19006/2015disposed

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kr. Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-05-21Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19006 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -114 Year- 2013 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kr. Singh, Son of Mahendra Singh, resident of Village- Hukra, P.O. + P.S. Darihat, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Vijeta Kumari Wife of Vikash Kumar,D/O K.B. Sahay Present AddressVillage- Mathuri, P.S.- Dalmiyanagar, District- Rohtas. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate.

For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Narsing Tanti(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 21-05-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner being husband apprehends his arrest in Complaint Case No. 114 of 2013, corresponding to Trial No. 1488 of 2014, registered for the offences punishable under Section 498A and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is ready to keep his wife on any undertaking.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner above named is directed to surrender in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and the court below shall enlarge the petitioner on provisional bail, after issuing notice to the informant, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19006 of 2015 (2) dt.21-05-2015 2/2 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dehri, Rohtas in Complaint Case No. 114 of 2013, corresponding to Trial No. 1488 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and the court below shall make efforts for reconciliation between the husband and the wife. If the dispute is resolved, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed and if the dispute does not resolve the court below shall pass order in accordance with law on the provisional bail of the petitioner.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) KKSINHA/- U T