Ramesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 2130 of 2017 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11280 of 2008 ====================================================== Ramesh Rai Son of Hazari Rai, resident of Village- Dhanaut, Tahal Tola, Police Station- Rupaspur, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sri Arvind Kumar Choudhary son of not known In- charge, the Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

3.

Sri Arvind Kumar Choudhary son of not known, the Deputy Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 4.

Sri Sarwan Kumar son of not known, the District Magistrate, Samastipur. 5.

Sri Afzalur Rahman, son of not known, the Deputy Development Commissioner cum Chief Executive Officer, Rural Development Agency, Samastipur.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG 4 with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AC to AAG 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 07-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to AAG 4 for the State.

2. The petitioner has moved the Court alleging non compliance of order dated 11.01.2016 passed in CWJC No. 11280 of 2008.

3. By the said order, the authorities were to consider the case of the petitioner afresh for regularization in terms of the relevant Rules of the year 2002. In the show cause filed on behalf

Patna High Court MJC No.2130 of 2017 dt.07-08-2019 2/2 of opposite party no. 2, copy of order dated 22.04.2019 has been brought on record by which the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Bihar, Patna has considered the case of the petitioner and has rejected his claim for reasons mentioned therein.

4. In such view of the matter, the present application alleging contempt having become infructuous, stands disposed off.

5. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to assail the order dated 22.04.2019 before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR U T