Raja Babu @ Raja Babu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61635 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2021 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

RAJA BABU @ RAJA BABU KUMAR Son of Harindra Sah @ Harendra Sah Resident of Village- Pathan Patti, P.S.- Harsidhi, District - East Champaran.

2.

VIRENDRA SAH Son of Chandrika Sah Resident of Village- Pathan Patti, P.S.- Harsidhi, District - East Champaran.

3.

PRABHU SAH Son of Late Mahadeo Sah Resident of Village- Pathan Patti, P.S.- Harsidhi, District - East Champaran.

4.

MAHENDRA SAH Son of Chandrika Sah Resident of Village- Pathan Patti, P.S.- Harsidhi, District - East Champaran.

5.

CHANDRIKA SAH Son of Late Mahadeo Sah Resident of Village- Pathan Patti, P.S.- Harsidhi, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madhurendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-05-2022 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application as against petitioners No. 1, 2, 4 and 5. Permitted to be withdrawn.

It is, thus, dismissed as withdrawn as against petitioners No. 1,2,4 and 5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61635 of 2021(2) dt.24-05-2022 2/2 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner No. 3 apprehends his arrest in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 186 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case of the case and also the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the prayer of the petitioner No. 3 for grant of anticipatory bail is accordingly rejected. It is, accordingly, dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T